BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Migration, Unequal Citizens, and Critical Legal Studies - ECPv6.16.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Migration, Unequal Citizens, and Critical Legal Studies
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw/cms
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Migration, Unequal Citizens, and Critical Legal Studies
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Shanghai
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20250101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20260413T080000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20261231T170000
DTSTAMP:20260612T214236
CREATED:20260413T072848Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260423T153349Z
UID:55153-1776067200-1798736400@transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw
SUMMARY:Journal Publish: Special Issue: Making Unfree Labour: Consent\, Exploitation\, and the Law
DESCRIPTION:  \nJournal: Innovation In The Social Science \nType: Special Issue \nSpecial Issue Title: Making Unfree Labour: Consent\, Exploitation\, and the Law \nVolume & Issue: Volume 4\, Issue 1\, 2026 \nGuest Editor: Ya-Wen Yang \nPublisher: Brill \nISSN: 2773-0611 \nAccess: https://brill.com/view/journals/iss/4/1/iss.4.issue-1.xml  \nArticles Included: \n\nYa-Wen Yang\, What Is Wrong with Forced Labour: Coercion or Exploitation? Reflections on Taiwan’s Temporary Migrant Worker Scheme\, 4 Innovation in the Social Sciences 5 (2026)\, https://brill.com/view/journals/iss/4/1/article-p5_2.xml\nFabiana Kutsche & Ulrike Lindner\, Between Work Regulation\, Integration into the Capitalist Economy and ‘African Laziness’: The International Labour Organization and African Workers\, 1927–1930\, 3 Innovation in the Social Sciences 31 (2025)\, https://brill.com/view/journals/iss/4/1/article-p31_3.xml\nHao-Yu Cho\, Transformation and Exploitation: The Impact of Labor Policies in Mexico’s Maquiladora Industry\, 4 Innovation in the Social Sciences 45 (2026)\, https://brill.com/view/journals/iss/4/1/article-p45_4.xml\nJonathan Parhusip\, Johanna Lee & Danielle Douglas\, The Kasbon System and the Paradox of Voluntary Entry into Unfree Labor in Taiwan’s Distant Water Fisheries\, 4 Innovation in the Social Sciences 67 (2026)\, https://brill.com/view/journals/iss/4/1/article-p67_5.xml\n\n  \nIntroduction: Making Unfree Labour: Consent\, Exploitation and the Law \nBy Guest Editor Ya-Wen Yang \nThis special issue originated in the workshop ‘The Production and Reproduction of Social Inequalities’\, held on 20–21 September 2024 in Hsinchu\, Taiwan. One of the workshop’s central themes was the relationship between inequality and exploitation. All the articles in this special issue fall within this broad topic. \nMore specifically\, however\, they address the complexities of the conceptualisation of unfree labour through law in particular contexts and historical moments and reflect on the visible and invisible duress that leads to exploitation. They explore how workers’ consent and its absence are managed in the workplace and how efforts to combat forced labour can\, paradoxically\, perpetuate exploitation. \nWhile the contributors take distinctive approaches to the exploration of a range of case studies\, they engage in dialogue with one another on two overarching perspectives. First\, they trace the legal expression of unfree labour as it emerges from political contestation. Second\, they analyse different techniques used to legitimise institutionalised labour control. \nKutsche and Lindner reveal the early controversies of the International Labour Organization (ILO) during its efforts to combat the forced labour imposed on ‘native labour’ in colonies\, which eventually led to ILO Convention No. 29 (1930). The Convention was the first international instrument to tackle forced labour and has been the backbone of the worldwide ban on this inhuman form of labour extraction to this day. \nIn this regard\, the Convention is a political achievement. However\, its creation was overshadowed by racism and colonialism. European colonial powers presumed that forcing Africans to work was a civilising mission to educate the locals in a positive work ethic. The legal formation of forced labour reflects the historical limitation that it required the support of the European powers\, who relied upon and defended the use of forced labour. It thus focuses on managing direct coercion\, while institutions that created economic duress driving indigenous people into poorly paid wage work\, such as poll taxes\, were largely left untouched. \nYang points out how this limitation underlying the Convention has become a contemporary encumbrance in the fight against human trafficking for labour exploitation in Taiwan. The narrow notion of forced labour led domestic judges ruling on human trafficking cases within the Taiwan–Philippines migration corridor to take migrant workers’ signatures on illegal debt agreements with intermediaries at face value. Migrant workers’ apparent consent\, in the eyes of the judges\, legitimised the illegal conduct of the intermediaries. This legal reasoning frustrated the initial purpose of Taiwan’s anti-human trafficking law and further consolidated the exploitative fee structure in place throughout the migration process. \nParhusip\, Lee and Douglas similarly seek to explain the paradoxical voluntariness of debt-financed migration and the deep-rooted coercion beneath it. They study the pervasiveness and burdens of the debts incurred to finance Indonesian fishers’ migration and personal necessities prior to and during their employment by Taiwanese employers—namely\, the kasbon system. Kasbon usually leads to a vicious spiral of debt; an initial debt tricks Indonesian fishers into agreeing to multiple rounds of debt and migration\, causing them to submit to abuses in the workplace. \nParhusip et al. observe that the ILO\, after a long development\, has established the principle of fair recruitment—that migrant workers should not bear the costs and expenses of their migration and employment. The Taiwanese government has also claimed to adhere to this principle under international pressure. However\, it has only performed a gesture of governance\, issuing formalist bans on illegal fee collections. Meanwhile\, the discriminatory laws against migrant fishers\, as well as the business model and profit structures of the intermediaries\, have been left intact. \nFinally\, Cho studies the changing dynamics between maquiladora workers and managers in Mexico following the loosening of regulations on dispatched workers in 2012. This legal change led to a surge of such workers\, who replaced a high percentage of formally employed factory staff. This\, in turn\, caused a shift in the management strategies at the author’s field site. The originally more family-like atmosphere on the production line was replaced by the distant relationships that necessarily accompany the nomadic nature of dispatched work. Dispatched workers also found it harder to organise themselves in the workplace. It thus turns out that the regulatory changes that make the workplace more fragmented function as an indirect means of strengthening control over labour. \nThe four articles represent different intensities of unfreedom on the spectrum of unfree labour. At one pole\, Kutsche and Lindner expose the violent oppression and the exploitation of African indigenous communities under European colonialism. At the other\, Cho documents factory wage-labourers who experience no direct coercion\, despite being threatened by the reserve army of dispatched workers created by neoliberal deregulatory trends. \nBetween these two poles\, Yang and Parhusip et al. highlight the plight of migrant workers. These workers are trapped in the double bind of discriminatory immigration regulations and a snare of debt structures. Because the pole of forced labour under colonialism appears so obviously wrong\, other forms of control over labour may appear less harmful\, less wrong and ultimately ‘not forced’. \nHowever\, the trajectory of long-term efforts to recognise how the institutional deprivation of people’s reasonable options constitutes coercion is precisely the lesson we can learn from the juxtaposition of the case studies here. It is exactly because unfreedom and exploitation can come in different shapes and degrees—and because their recognition is always a political struggle—that we need to analyse how coercion is read as benign and how the law is used to legitimise economic duress as consent. This special issue seeks to do just that. \nThe original workshop was a collaboration between the International Centre for Cultural Studies (ICCS) at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University\, the Social Inequalities Research Unit at the University of Cologne and the Africa–China Research Network at Academia Sinica. We thank those whose contributions made this collection possible. Among them are Professor Poe Yu-ze Wan\, Chief Editor of this journal\, and Professor Joyce C.H. Liu\, Director of the ICCS. \n\n\n\n\n\nMigration\, Unequal Citizens\, and Critical Legal Studies\n\n\n\n\nThis interdisciplinary research cluster belongs to the MOE SPROUT 2.0 “Conflict\, Justice\, Decolonization 2.0: Asia in Transition in the 21st Century“\, operated by the International Center for Cultural Studies\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University\, Taiwan. \nAccording to the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD)\, the total number of international migrants had amounted to 272 million in mid-2019\, up from 173 million in 2000. Compared to 70 million international migrants in 1960\, the figure has increased by 200 million. Among the total number of international migrants\, about 100 million international migrants were from Asia\, and 83 million were migrating within Asia. Most countries in Asia still practice exclusionary politics of citizenship. The migrant workers and stateless persons suffer severe discrimination and even inhuman treatment because of their non-citizen status. \nThe first five-year ICCS project\, “Unequal Citizens and Legal Reform in the Inter-Asian Context” (2018-2022)\, has discussed the theme of “Conflict\, Justice\, and Decolonization” to understand the crux of the problem from the scene of social conflict from the perspective of transnational migration and labor mobility. Our shared concerns include the different forms of social conflict and inequality in third-world countries within the global context. We paid particular attention to the issues of refugees\, mobile laborers\, stateless persons\, and human trafficking under mass migration. We discussed the formation of severely excluded discrimination\, oppression\, and violence as expressed in laws and institutions in different societies. However\, the international labor migration under globalization constantly faces exploitation\, forced labor\, and human trafficking\, particularly in Asia-Pacific. \nThe second five-year project (2023-2027) will focus on analyzing the forced labor risks in the global supply chain and addressing effective practices for eliminating forced labor\, including law enforcement strategy. Our project will continue to deepen the transnational cooperation with research institutions\, research scholars\, and non-governmental organizations to develop more significant contributions to labor rights and access to justice for migrant workers\, stateless populations\, and undocumented workers. We orient our project toward a critical legal study in terms of empirical cases and emancipatory articulation of particular fundamental concepts\, including citizenship.
URL:https://transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw/cms/event/journal-publish-special-issue-making-unfree-labour-consent-exploitation-and-the-law/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw/cms/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/coverimage.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20260504T080000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20260504T170000
DTSTAMP:20260612T214236
CREATED:20260504T021642Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260504T021706Z
UID:55229-1777881600-1777914000@transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw
SUMMARY:Global Production Networks\, the State\, and Migrant Workers: Governing Labour in the Semiconductor Industry
DESCRIPTION:Time\nMay 4\, 2026 (Monday)\, 13:30– 16:00(GMT+8\, Taiwan Time) \nVenue\nOnsite and online synchronous session\, conducted entirely in Mandarin with English simultaneous interpretation. \nOnsite：\nA401\, Assembly Building I\, Guangfu Campus\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University \nOnline：\nWebex link will be sent to your email. \nOrganizer\nInternational Center for Cultural Studies\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU)\nSchool of Law\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU) \nAgenda \n13:10-13:30  Registration \n13:30-15:30  Keynote Speech \nModerator：\nAssoc. Prof. Yu-Fan Chiu\, School of Law\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung  University\nKeynote Speakers：\nAsst. Prof. Ting-Chien Chen\, Department of Geography\, National Kaohsiung Normal University\nDiscussant：\nProf. Mei-Lin Pan\, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University\nDr. Chiung-Chih Chen\, Postdoctoral Research Fellow\, Resilient and Sustainable Development  Center\, National Tsing Hua University \n15:30-16:00 Q&A \n  \n活動時間\n2026年5月4日 (一) 13:30–16:00 \n活動地點\n實體線上同步，提供全程中英文同步翻譯 \n實體：國立陽明交通大學光復校區 綜合一館 A401教室（實體出席可抵專討一次；實體限額40人） \n線上：報名後將以電子郵件寄送 Webex 會議連結 \n主辦單位\n國立陽明交通大學 文化研究國際中心\n國立陽明交通大學 科技法律學院 \n  \n議程 \n13:10-13:30 報到 \n13:30-15:30 大會演講  \n主持人：邱羽凡 副教授（國立陽明交通大學科技法律學院） \n主講人 ：\n陳亭茜 助理教授（國立高雄師範大學地理學系） \n與談人：\n潘美玲 教授（國立陽明交通大學人文社會學系）\n陳炯志 博士後研究員（國立清華大學 永續與韌性發展中心） \n15:30-16:00 問答
URL:https://transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw/cms/event/global-production-networks-the-state-and-migrant-workers-governing-labour-in-the-semiconductor-industry/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw/cms/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/全球生產網絡、國家與移工：半導體產業中的勞動治理_主視覺_檢視檔.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20260515
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20260516
DTSTAMP:20260612T214236
CREATED:20260515T063136Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260515T074648Z
UID:55241-1778803200-1778889599@transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw
SUMMARY:Da Wang: The first human trafficking court case involving a Taiwanese-owned FOC vessel. Kaohsiung District Court Trial Observation — Call for Participation
DESCRIPTION:Da Wang: The first human trafficking court case involving a Taiwanese-owned FOC vessel. Kaohsiung District Court Trial Observation — Call for Participation\n  \n■ Time:\nMonday\, May 18\, 2026\, 2:20 p.m. \n■ Location:\nCriminal Court\, Courtroom 4\, Kaohsiung District Court\n1F\, No. 188\, Hedong Road\, Qianjin District\, Kaohsiung City \n■ Key Issues for Court Observation and Case Background:\nThe fishing vessel Da Wang is the first non-Taiwanese flag of convenience vessel involving Taiwanese investment to be indicted for human trafficking and brought into judicial proceedings in Taiwan. \nThis case arose from a serious fatal incident on a distant-water fishing vessel in June 2019. The Da Wang\, a flag of convenience vessel invested in by Taiwanese nationals and registered in Vanuatu\, was the site of a violent incident in which Indonesian fisher Sunoto died after being struck on the back of the head by a Taiwanese chief officer. According to Greenpeace’s report Seabound: The Journey to Modern Slavery on the High Seas\, other fishers on board were also subjected to forced labor conditions\, including excessive working hours and wage deductions. \nIn 2020\, the Da Wang docked in Taiwan\, and a Filipino fisher on the same vessel\, Manny\, sought protection from the Taiwanese government. He was later identified as a victim of human trafficking. \nIn 2020\, U.S. Customs and Border Protection issued a Withhold Release Order against seafood harvested by the Da Wang. In the same year\, Taiwan’s fishing industry was listed for the first time by the U.S. Department of Labor on its List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor\, alongside products such as cotton from Xinjiang. \nAfter years of investigation\, the Kaohsiung District Prosecutors Office indicted nine individuals\, including the vessel owner and captain\, in 2022. However\, despite the indictment\, the first-instance proceedings in the Da Wang human trafficking case have yet to conclude. Four years later\, in mid-May 2026\, the case will finally proceed to a preparatory hearing. \nWe welcome all those concerned with the Taiwan-U.S. trade agreement\, distant-water fishers\, business and human rights\, forced labor\, and seafood supply chain issues to join this court observation. \n■ For more information on the Da Wang case\, please see the reference materials below. \n  \n大旺號，首次權宜船成為人口販運司法案件。高雄地院法庭觀察，動員通知！\n  \n■ 時間：2026年05月18日（一）下午2點20分 \n■ 地點：高雄地方法院刑事庭第四法庭（高雄市前金區河東路188號1樓） \n■ 法庭觀察看點與案件背景說明：\n大旺號漁船，是台灣首次有非我籍的權宜船，被以人口販運罪起訴並進入司法程序。 \n這是發生於2019年6月的重大遠洋漁船海上喋血案，臺灣人投資並登記在萬那杜的權宜船「大旺號」，爆發印尼籍漁工 Sunoto 遭台灣籍大副攻擊後腦致死，根據綠色和平的報告「海上奴役」指出，其他漁工也遭到包括超時工作與苛扣薪資等強迫勞動的情事。大旺號於2020年靠岸台灣，同船菲籍漁工 Manny 向台灣政府尋求庇護，並被鑑定為人口販運受害者。 \n2020年美國海關（CBP）對大旺號下達漁獲暫扣令（WRO），台灣漁業也被美國勞工部首度列入「童工與強迫勞動製品清單」，與新疆棉齊名。高雄地檢署經過多年的調查，終於在 2022 年起訴船東、船長等 9 人。起訴後經過漫長的等待，大旺號人口販運案連一審都還沒結束，4年後的2026年5月中終於迎來本案的準備程序。 \n歡迎更多關注台美貿易協定、遠洋漁工、企業人權責任、強迫勞動、以及海鮮供應鍊議題的朋友們，一起參與法庭觀察。 \n■ 更多大旺號相關的資訊，請見下方參考資料
URL:https://transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw/cms/event/da-wang-first-flag-of-convenience-vessel-to-become-a-human-trafficking-judicial-case-kaohsiung-district-court-trial-observation-call-for-participation/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw/cms/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/S__159277202.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20260602T183000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Shanghai:20260602T203000
DTSTAMP:20260612T214236
CREATED:20260525T030045Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260525T030745Z
UID:55264-1780425000-1780432200@transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw
SUMMARY:Trade Policy and Labor Rights: Competition and Convergence
DESCRIPTION:Event Title: Trade Policy and Labor Rights: Competition and Convergence\nIntroduction to the Event:\nAmid the restructuring of global supply chains and intensifying geopolitical competition\, trade policy is no longer limited to tariff reductions. It has increasingly become an important policy instrument for advancing labor rights protection and human rights standards. The National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Law and the International Center for Cultural Studies (ICCS) have long been concerned with this issue and have continued to explore related institutional developments. This event is organized by ICCS Subproject III\, “Migration\, Unequal Citizenship\, and Critical Legal Studies\,” and features Associate Professor Ying-Jun Lin of the Fu Jen Catholic University School of Law as the keynote speaker. The event will be moderated by Associate Professor Yu-Fan Chiu\, the principal investigator of the project\, with Attorney Yen-Po Chen of InfoShare Tech Law Office and Bonny Ling\, Executive Director of Work Better Innovations\, serving as discussants. Together\, they will explore the complex relationship between trade policy and labor rights protection. This lecture will approach the issue from the perspective of international trade law\, analyzing the interaction between trade liberalization and labor rights protection\, while also examining the development and institutional implications of labor provisions in contemporary trade agreements.\nAssociate Professor Ying-Jun Lin specializes in international economic and trade law and regional economic integration. Drawing on the perspective of international trade law\, she will discuss how trade policy\, in the context of global supply chain restructuring\, interacts with labor rights protection\, and will further guide us in reflecting on issues such as forced labor\, supply chain governance\, and geoeconomic competition. \nTime:\nJune 2\, 2026 (Tuesday)\, 18:30–20:30 (GMT+8\, Taiwan Time) \nVenue:\nOnsite and online synchronous session\, conducted entirely in Mandarin with English simultaneous interpretation \nOnsite Venue:\nA402\, Assembly Building I\, Guangfu Campus\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University \nOnline:\nWebex link will be sent to your email after registration \nOrganizers:\nInternational Center for Cultural Studies\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (ICCS-NYCU)\nSchool of Law\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU LAW)\nSubproject 3: Migration\, Unequal Citizens\, and Critical Legal Studies \nAgenda:\n18:10–18:30 Registration\n18:30–20:10 Keynote Speech\n20:10–20:30 Q&A \nModerator:\nAssociate. Prof. Yu-Fan Chiu\, School of Law\, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University \nKeynote Speaker:\nAssociate. Prof. Ying-Jun Lin\, School of Law\, Fu Jen Catholic University \nDiscussants:\nAttorney Yen-Po Chen\, InfoShare Tech Law Office\nDr. Bonny Ling\, Executive Director\, Work Better Innovations \nLink to Register:\nhttps://forms.gle/2JCdqmYnNz8B9iub6 \n活動名稱：貿易政策與勞動權益的競與合\n活動簡介：\n在全球供應鏈重組與地緣政治競逐的浪潮下，貿易政策不再僅限於關稅減讓，而逐漸成為推動勞動權益保障與人權標準的重要政策工具。國立陽明交通大學科技法律學院與文化研究國際中心（ICCS）長期關注此一議題，並持續探討相關制度發展。本次活動由ICCS子計畫三「遷移、不平等公民、批判法律研究」邀請輔仁大學法律學院林映均副教授主講，並由計畫主持人邱羽凡副教授主持，以及由益思科技法律事務所陳言博律師及 Work Better Innovations 執行長凌怡華博士擔任與談人，共同探討貿易政策與勞動權益保障之間的競合關係。本次演講將從國際貿易法的視角出發，分析貿易自由化與勞動權益保障之間的互動，並檢視當代貿易協定中勞動條款的發展與制度意涵。\n林映均老師專精於國際經貿法與區域經濟整合，將從國際貿易法的視角出發，探討全球供應鏈重組下，貿易政策如何與勞動權益保障產生競合關係，並進一步帶領我們思考強迫勞動、供應鏈治理與地緣經濟競爭等議題。 \n活動時間：\n2026 年 6 月 2 日（二）18:30–20:30 \n活動地點：\n實體線上同步，提供全程中英文同步翻譯 \n實體地點：\n國立陽明交通大學光復校區 綜合一館 A402 教室 \n線上方式：\n報名後將以電子郵件寄送 Webex 會議連結 \n主辦單位：\nICCS 國立陽明交通大學文化研究國際中心\nNYCU LAW 國立陽明交通大學科技法律學院\n子計畫三「遷移、不平等公民、批判法律研究」 \n議程：\n18:10–18:30 報到\n18:30–20:10 大會演講\n20:10–20:30 問答 \n主持人：\n邱羽凡 副教授（國立陽明交通大學科技法律學院） \n主講人：\n林映均 副教授（輔仁大學法律學院） \n與談人：\n陳言博 律師（益思科技法律事務所）\n凌怡華 博士（Work Better Innovations 執行長） \n報名資訊：\nhttps://forms.gle/2JCdqmYnNz8B9iub6
URL:https://transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw/cms/event/trade-policy-and-labor-rights-competition-and-convergence/
LOCATION:A402\, Assembly Building I\, Guangfu Campus\, NYCU
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://transit-asia.chss.nycu.edu.tw/cms/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/【活動海報】貿易政策與勞動權益的競與合_檢視檔-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR