“Yu Fu” Fishers’ Lawsuit for Minimum Wage Differentials — Third Hearing at Pingtung District Court on March 31, 2026
March 12, 2026

Time: March 31, 2026 (Tuesday), 2:50 PM
Location: Civil Division, Pingtung District Court (No. 47, Hezuo Street, Pingtung City, Courtroom 3)
Eight fishers who were previously owed wages by the Taiwanese fishing vessel Yu Fu filed a civil lawsuit with the Pingtung District Court at the end of 2024. They seek payment of wage differentials in accordance with the minimum wage under the Labor Standards Act (LSA). The third hearing in this case is scheduled for March 31, 2026.
In August 2024, the Taiwanese distant-water fishing vessel Yu Fu was accused of withholding 15 months of wages from Indonesian fishers, as well as engaging in practices indicative of forced labor, including confiscation of identity documents and insufficient provision of food and drinking water during voyages. Following media exposure, the vessel owner claimed to have resolved the matter by calculating back pay based on a monthly wage of USD 550 per person (approximately NTD 17,800; adjusted to USD 570 per month as of January 1, 2026), paying a total of USD 80,850 (approximately NTD 2.64 million), along with an additional compensation of NTD 2,000 per worker.
However, the fishers represented by legal counsel, filed a civil lawsuit arguing that their wages should have been calculated in accordance with the minimum wage under the LSA. They are therefore seeking payment of wage differentials as well as damages for violations of their personality rights.
Litigation Team: Distant-Water Fisheries Are Subject to the LSA
The central argument advanced by the plaintiffs’ legal team is that labor relations aboard distant-water fishing vessels are governed by the LSA. The LSA applies to all employment relationships within Taiwan, regardless of the worker’s nationality, unless a specific industry has been formally excluded by the competent authority. To date, the Ministry of Labor has never issued any announcement excluding distant-water fisheries from the scope of the LSA.
In other words, foreign fishers working on Taiwanese-flagged distant-water vessels are effectively working within Taiwan’s jurisdiction and are therefore entitled to LSA protections, including minimum wage guarantees.
According to government announcements, the monthly minimum wage was NTD 26,400 in 2023 and NTD 27,470 in 2024. However, the employer paid only NTD 17,800 per month, which falls below the statutory standard. Although the vessel owner relied on the wage standard set forth in the Regulations on the Authorization and Management of Overseas Employment of Foreign Crew Members, this regulation is subordinate in legal hierarchy to the LSA and cannot override statutory minimum wage protections.
Furthermore, upon reviewing employment contracts and related documents, the plaintiffs’ legal team found that the Indonesian fishers had first entered Taiwan and completed their hiring procedures in Donggang, Pingtung. This contradicts the employer’s claim that they were “offshore employment.” In essence, these fishers were employed within Taiwan throughout the entire period and worked aboard a Taiwanese-flagged vessel. (For further legal details, please refer to the dedicated “Yu Fu” case page on this website.)
Prosecutors Decline to Indict Under Human Trafficking Law
Following the exposure of the Yu Fu case, the Indonesian fishers were identified as potential victims of human trafficking by the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau. The Pingtung District Prosecutors Office subsequently launched a criminal investigation against the vessel owner.
However, in April 2025, the prosecutors issued a non-prosecution decision, concluding that the fishers had received remuneration for their work and that there was no objective evidence demonstrating a “clear disproportion between labor and compensation.” Therefore, the case did not meet the threshold for prosecution under the Human Trafficking Prevention Act.
Supporting organizations and the plaintiffs were only informed of this decision in late June 2025, by which time the ten-day deadline to request reconsideration had already expired, leaving no opportunity for legal remedy. (See also the joint statement by supporting organizations: “Waiting for Justice: Taiwan’s Failure to Prosecute the Human Trafficking Case of Indonesian Fishers on the ‘Yu Fu’ Violates International Legal Standards.”)
Third Civil Hearing: Seeking Judicial Progress and Public Attention
This civil case has encountered several procedural setbacks. After the complaint was filed in 2024, the case proceeded to mediation in February 2025. However, the mediation failed due to the absence of a representative from the vessel owner. The first and second hearings were held in August and November 2025, respectively, but progress was delayed due to the reassignment and retirement of the presiding judges.
The upcoming hearing on March 31, 2026, will be the third hearing in the case and the first under the newly assigned judge. It is expected to focus on clarifying the disputed issues, organizing evidence, and confirming the direction of the proceedings.
Members of the public who are concerned about this case, migrant workers’ rights, and the development of Taiwan’s fishing industry are welcome to attend the hearing and show their support.
《銪富號》漁工要求給付最低工資差額訴訟 2026年3月31日屏東第三次開庭
2026年3月12日

八名曾遭台灣漁船《銪富號》欠薪的漁工,在前(2024)年底向屏東法院提起民事訴訟,要求船東給付符合《勞動基準法》最低工資的工資差額,本案將於今(2026)年3月31日第三次開庭。
台灣遠洋漁船《銪富號》在2024年8月遭控拖欠印尼漁工15個月的薪資,並扣留身分證件、出海期間缺乏足夠的食物和飲用水等強迫勞動之風險。經媒體報導,船東主張依《境外僱用非我國籍船員許可及管理辦法》中的每月薪資標準、每人 550 元美金(約新台幣17,800元,已於2026年1月1日起調整為每月570元美金)計算,補發總計美金 80,850 元、約新台幣 264 萬元的工資,並給予每人新台幣2,000元的補償金,稱事情已解決。
其中的八名漁工委託律師提起民事訴訟,認為雇主應按《勞動基準法》(下稱《勞基法》)的最低工資,要求給付工資差額,並請求人格權損害賠償。
訴訟團隊:遠洋漁業受《勞基法》規範,船員之薪資理受《勞基法》最低工資保障
律師最大的主張,是遠洋漁業船上的勞雇關係受《勞基法》規範。《勞基法》適用一切的勞雇關係,只要在台灣境內工作,不分受僱者之國籍,均受到保障,除非該行業經中央主管機關勞動指定公告排除,然勞動部未曾公告排除遠洋漁業。換句話說,外籍漁工在懸掛台灣旗的遠洋漁船上工作,形同在台灣境內工作,即自動在《勞基法》的保障範圍中,薪資自然需符合《勞基法》的標準。
根據政府公告,2023和2024年的月最低工資分別為新台幣 26,400 元與 27,470 元,而雇主僅支付他們每月17,800元,並未符合標準。雖然漁船雇主主張按照《境外僱用非我國籍船員許可及管理辦法》的薪資標準,但該辦法的法律位階低於《勞基法》,無法凌駕《勞基法》的最低工資保障。
此外,在本案中,律師檢視漁工的僱傭契約等文件,發現《銪富號》的印尼漁工是先入境台灣、並在屏東東港完成聘僱程序,並非如雇主所述為境外聘僱。總體來說,這幾位印尼漁工至始至終都是在「台灣境內」受僱,在台灣船旗的漁船上工作。(更多法律細節可參考本網站《銪富號》專屬頁面)
屏東地檢署認無「勞動與報酬顯不相當」 調查《人口販運防制法》不起訴
《銪富號》爆發後,這些印尼漁工被法務部調查局鑑定為人口販運被害人,同時,屏東地方檢察署也對船東展開刑事調查。然而,地檢署在去(2025)年4月做出不起訴決定,理由是認定受害漁工均已獲得工作報酬,且無客觀證據顯示他們所從事的工作有「勞動與報酬顯不相當」的情況。
聲援本案的團體和當事人都遲至6月底才輾轉獲知地檢署的決定,但此時聲請再議的十日期限已過,無法進行救濟。(參考聲援團體的聲明:等待正義:台灣未能起訴「銪富號」印尼籍漁工的人口販運案件 違反國際法要求,歡迎聯署聲明)
民事訴訟第三次開庭 盼案情獲司法進展、社會關注
本案的民事訴訟歷經幾番波折,在2024年受托律師遞狀屏東法院後,在隔(2025)年2月進到調解庭,然因漁船公司未委託代表出席而調解未果,接著,本案在同年8月進行第一次開庭、11月第二次開庭,卻接連遇到主持法官調任及退休,因此遲未進到實質辯論的程序。今(2026)年3月31日將是本案第三次開庭,也是新主持法官針對該案的第一次開庭,預計將聚焦爭點釐清、整理證據與確認審理方向。
我們歡迎所有關注此案、移工人權、台灣漁業發展的所有人旁聽,一起聲援此案。
